{"source":{"name":"The Evidence Hub - on the regulation of digital services","url":"https:\/\/evidencehub.net","license":"Creative Common CC-BY 4.0 International"},"data":[{"data":[26,33,35,37,40,41,46,49,49,51,58,62,63,63,64,64,65,66,67,69],"name":"Islamic State"},{"data":[null,1,2,5,6,7,8,12,13,13,14,15,17,18,20,20,21,21,22,22],"name":"Other Jihadi"}],"_data":[["Cummulative suspension rate (%)","Islamic State","Other Jihadi"],["5","26","0"],["10","33","1"],["15","35","2"],["20","37","5"],["25","40","6"],["30","41","7"],["35","46","8"],["40","49","12"],["45","49","13"],["50","51","13"],["55","58","14"],["60","62","15"],["65","63","17"],["70","63","18"],["75","64","20"],["80","64","20"],["85","65","21"],["90","66","21"],["95","67","22"],["100","69","22"]],"labels":{"name":"Cummulative suspension rate (%)","values":["5","10","15","20","25","30","35","40","45","50","55","60","65","70","75","80","85","90","95","100"]},"metadata":{"link":"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/1057610X.2018.1513984","type":"Solution","unit":"Number of days account survived (binned every five days)","year":"2017","title":"Cumulative Suspension Rate For All Accounts in Database","topic":"Incitement to Terrorism","method":"Data mining","source":"Conway, Maura, Moign Khawaja, Suraj Lakhani, Jeremy Reffin, Andrew Robertson and David Weir. \u201cDisrupting Daesh: Measuring Takedown of Online Terrorist Material and Its Impacts,\u201d Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29 October 2018","sub_topic":"Removal of terrorist content","chart_number":"53","geographical":"Global"},"description":"The graph shows the cumulative suspension rate for all accounts identified as being Islamic State or Jihadi by the number of days the accounts survived before being suspended. The data shows that Islamic State accounts have had higher suspension rates compared to other Jihadi accounts."}