{"source":{"name":"The Evidence Hub - on the regulation of digital services","url":"https:\/\/evidencehub.net","license":"Creative Common CC-BY 4.0 International"},"data":[{"data":[90.8,32.1,13.9,25],"name":"General user (%)"},{"data":[96.8,88.2,40.5,95.5],"name":"Trusted flagger\/reporter (%)"}],"_data":[["Platform","General user (%)","Trusted flagger\/reporter (%)"],["Facebook","90.8","96.8"],["Twitter","32.1","88.2"],["YouTube","13.9","40.5"],["Instagram","25","95.5"]],"labels":{"name":"Platform","values":["Facebook","Twitter","YouTube","Instagram"]},"metadata":{"link":"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/info\/sites\/info\/files\/code_of_conduct_factsheet_7_web.pdf","type":"Solution","unit":"Share of users receiving feedback (%)","year":"2019","Range":"0 100","title":"Feedback Provided to Different Types of User by Social Media Platforms ","topic":"Hate Speech","method":"Self-reporting","source":"European Commission. Fourth Evaluation on the Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech Online (Brussels: European Commission, 2019)  ","sub_topic":"Removal of hate speech","chart_number":"66","geographical":"European Union"},"description":"The chart shows the percent of users who reported posts who received feedback regarding their report on various social media platforms. Facebook was most likely to provide feedback to normal users and to trusted flaggers. All of the platforms were more likely to provide feedback to trusted flaggers than to normal users."}