{"source":{"name":"The Evidence Hub - on the regulation of digital services","url":"https:\/\/evidencehub.net","license":"Creative Common CC-BY 4.0 International"},"data":[{"data":[29],"name":"Misleading content"},{"data":[24],"name":"False context"},{"data":[6],"name":"Manipulated content"},{"data":[30],"name":"Fabricated content"},{"data":[8],"name":"Imposter content"},{"data":[3],"name":"Satire\/parody "}],"_data":[["Type of content","Misleading content","False context","Manipulated content","Fabricated content","Imposter content","Satire\/parody "],["Share of content","29","24","6","30","8","3"]],"labels":{"name":"Type of content","values":["Share of content"]},"metadata":{"link":"https:\/\/reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk\/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation","type":"Problem","year":"2020","title":"Reconfigured versus Fabricated Misinformation","topic":"Disinformation","method":"Survey ","source":"Brennen, J. Scott, Felix Simon, Philip N. Howard, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. \"Types, Sources and Claims of COVID-19 Misinformation,\" Reuters Institute, 07 April 2020","sub_topic":"Prevalence of illegal content","chart_number":"101","geographical":"European Union"},"description":"The chart shows the proportion of reconfigured (N=133) and fabricated (N=86) misinformation in the sample (N=225) and the types of misinformation that constitute both reconfigured and fabricated misinformation. Out of the share of the content showed above, 59% is reconfigured (out of misleading, false context and manipulated content) and 38% is fabricated (out of fabricated and imposter content)."}